Re: callback params - which is fastest?

[Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>]

> a) table:
> 	+ conceptually "the right thing"
> 	- performance must be lowest?

Have you tested it? If performance is low, you can try to reuse a table
(instead of creating a new one for each call).


> b) ... (lots of integer values):
> 	+ fast to send, fast to receive
> 	- is there a limit to the number of args one can get?  is 10000 too 
> many?

Far too many.

-- Roberto