Re: 51w4 vararg tailcall + upvalue bug fix

["Adam D. Moss" <adam@...>]

Mike Pall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adam D. Moss wrote:
>
> > I've checked, and this fix made it to 5.1w5.
>
> Yes and no. The fix is wrong (base should be ci->base). Compare to my
> original bug report.

I did notice a difference, but I didn't think it was semantically
significant.  But I was apparently wrong!

--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss   -   adam@gimp.org