|
|
||
|
On Feb 28, 2005, at 17:09, Mark Hamburg wrote:
on 2/28/05 8:32 AM, David Jones at drj@pobox.com wrote:
Show me some code that might use math.nan. if x == math.nan ? I don't
think so.
x = 0 for index = 1, 100 do x = x + ( t[ index ] or math.nan ) end
Any missing indices will result in a sum of NaN.
David Jones