|
|
||
|
on 2/28/05 8:32 AM, David Jones at drj@pobox.com wrote:
> Show me some code that might use math.nan. if x == math.nan ? I don't
> think so.
x = 0
for index = 1, 100 do
x = x + ( t[ index ] or math.nan )
end
Any missing indices will result in a sum of NaN.
Mark