Re: LUObject revisited

[PA <petite.abeille@...>]

On Jan 28, 2005, at 03:19, skaller wrote:

> Looks pretty nice -- although some sugar might simplifiy the technique 
> a bit it seems workable.

My current thinking is that instead of sugar I will try to use 
something along the lines of LuaLint to check the "structural" 
soundness of a given LUObject.

I guess that this could be achieved pretty easily using Lua's existing 
debug functions as well.

After all, a LUObject is merely a set of packaging and naming 
conventions. It should be trivial, but quite useful, to check that a 
LUObject effectively follows those "guidelines".

>  Have you tried anything slightly 'bigger'?

Hmmm... not sure what you mean by "bigger" in this context? Care to 
elaborate?

Thanks for the feedbacks :)

Cheers

--
PA, Onnay Equitursay
http://alt.textdrive.com/