[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: work4 - loadfile and packaging
- From: Mark Hamburg <mhamburg@...>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:42:24 -0800
If dofile were to take extra parameters, it might be better to have it take
an environment:
function dofile( name, env, ... )
local f = loadfile( name )
if env then
setfenv( f, env )
end
return f( ... )
end
Or go all out and specify it as:
function dofile( name, dir, env, ... )
local f = loadfile( name, dir )
if env then
setfenv( f, env )
end
return f( ... )
end
Mark
on 1/16/05 3:49 PM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo at lhf@tecgraf.puc-rio.br
wrote:
>> 5.1 work4 has enhanced loadfile() so that it takes a second optional
>> parameter, namely the path to search for the file.
> [...]
>> My question is whether dofile() should have the take the same
>> optional second parameter?
>
> Now that 5.1 allows access to unnamed varargs via "...", you may argue that
> it'd be better to map
> dofile(f,a1,a2,a3)
> into
> loadfile(f)(a1,a2,a3)
>
> But perhaps it'd be simpler to just do as you suggest -- people needing
> to pass arguments to chunks could use
> loadfile(f,path)(a1,a2,a3)
> directly (and be clear about it).
>
> --lhf