Re: GC [was Re: Lua 5.1 (work4) now available]

lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: GC [was Re: Lua 5.1 (work4) now available]
From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:41:49 -0200

> So ... do you have an example where the non-incremental mode fails?

My comparisons were against 5.0.2. I got the impression that 5.0.2 used
less memory than 5.1 with incmode=0. But I was unable to reproduce these
results now :)

-- Roberto

References:
- Re: GC [was Re: Lua 5.1 (work4) now available], Mike Pall

Prev by Date: Some GC measurements
Next by Date: Re: Some GC measurements
Previous by thread: Re: GC [was Re: Lua 5.1 (work4) now available]
Next by thread: Re: comparing Lua with other languages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread