[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.1 (work1) now available
- From: David Burgess <dburgess@...>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 23:06:20 +1000
I agree with Philippe that (for me) the one thing Lua misses is
a large string buffer class.
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 11:58:39 +0200, Philippe Lhoste <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Eric Tetz wrote:
> > Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
> >>- there are several other small changes
> > What I've found (by comparing _G in 5.0 vs 5.1):
> > Removed:
> > io.popen
> > arg.n
> > Added:
> > _PATH
> > New name for LUA_PATH (now deprecated) used by 'require'
> > string.reverse (s)
> > returns a reversed copy of string 's'
> This one is very strange...
> Can somebody give me a real-world use case where this function is so
> useful that it needs to go in a standard library? I can't think any
> practical use myself. Perhaps it is a temporary test function?
> I would rather see a string buffer library added to the standard
> library. One that would allow building large strings without hashing and
> perhaps GC overhead, allowing direct read/write of bytes in arbitrary
> addresses within the string size, automatic growth of buffer (or not), etc.
> Unless somebody really convinces me that the table approach is almost as
> memory efficient and hashing can't be avoided anyway because Lua does it
> on every string it sees...
> (If I do:
> x = string.sub(largeStr, i, j)
> x = nil
> does x is being hashed?)
> I dream of such library for quite a long time (since Roberto did his LTN
> about string concatenation efficiency) and discovered later that it
> exists in Java (and probably on a number of other languages with high
> level string processing).
> I would write it myself, but never got time to start it...
> So would it be useful at all?
> Philippe Lhoste
> -- (near) Paris -- France
> -- Professional programmer and amateur artist
> -- http://Phi.Lho.free.fr
> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --