[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: RE: Lua5 benchmarks
- From: "Joel Pritchett" <jpritchett@...>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:19:05 -0800
How was that test code generated? I love the fact that some of the vc++
tests failed because the author of the test tried using 'iota' instead
of 'itoa'. If they didn't take the time to even compile the test code
ahead of time, how do we know that the rest of the code that did work
was written in a rational way?
Still, it is a good indicator.
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Roberto
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:07 AM
To: Lua discussion list
Subject: Lua5 benchmarks
The "Great Win32 Computer Language Shootout"
(http://dada.perl.it/shootout/) has been updated to include Lua 5.0
(our thanks to Aldo Calpini). It still keeps Lua 4.0, so it is a nice
place to compare the performance of both versions. As expected, 5.0
outperforms 4.0 in almost all tests. In the final scorebord, Lua 5.0
scaled up five positions (compared to Lua 4.0).