[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: luac.lua
- From: "Leandro Candido" <enclle@...>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:34:28 -0300
----- Original Message -----
From: "Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: luac.lua
> >I want to have some things explained
> Ask away!
> >well, I will see what I can do. Some thing that I want to do is replace
> >debug/trace calls (lua_DXX?) and tests with #ifdef LUA_WITHDEBUG. I'm not
> >speaking about lua debug, but the "runtime" one. For example, the user
> >a source file and test, then compile it, and execute in my prog. If he do
> > print(x) -- x never declared
> >He will have only an error msg, not a stack dump.
> If you're using lua.c, simply do
> function _TRACEBACK(x) return x end
I imaigne that if I don't need the info, then I can speed up execution
less calls and tests inside the lua vm code...), but ok, I'm testing yet.
> Yes, lua and luac in test/. If these are trouble, we can remove them.
No problems, only some warnings and nothing more :-).
Thank you very much,