[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: LuaPlus
- From: "Dylan Cuthbert" <dylan@...>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:23:33 +0900
Sorry about the font, not sure why its crappy looking on your screen - I'm
posting in plain text but "charset="iso-2022-jp" is in the message header
because I used the japanese version of Outlook I suppose.
So you are the man behind LuaPlus, ok, what I meant by LuaBind being better
supported was by comparing the home pages, LuaBind is very slick for some
reason, and also a lot of the stuff at the bottom of the LuaPlus home page
says "obsolete" etc. Also I couldn't find an e-mail address or your name
even so I didn't know where to go to ask questions. :-) But it sounds like
you're pretty active. Do you have a mailing list or do you simply answer
questions on a person-to-person basis?
Any ideas regarding this vector thing I'm working on? ;-)
Q-Games, Dylan Cuthbert.
"Joshua Jensen" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> I'm not sure what font you're using, but shown in Outlook, it's atrocious.
> > In the newsgroup archives I found mention of LuaPlus
> > (http://wwhiz.com/LuaPlus), an extension to Lua for C++ with
> > addin support for Visual Studio's debugger and a whole lot more.
> > Anyone else using this? it looked rather good, especially
> > the Lua core
> > enhancements: integral support for wide strings and
> > metatables for integral types too.
> Microsoft shipped Amped: Freestyle Snowboarding
> (http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2001-08/msg00068.html) using a LuaPlus
> version written for Lua 4.1 Alpha. Sometime in the next six months, I am
> aware of 5 game titles that will be shipping using LuaPlus. I am also
> of several other games whose ship dates I don't know using LuaPlus. In
> addition, there are quite a few other companies who have been in contact
> with me with questions/feature requests.
> So in answer to your question, yes, there are quite a few people using it.
> > A lot of the C++ wrappers made sense too.
> Yep. LuaObject and LuaTableIterator are my favorites. LuaObject doesn't
> require any form of stack manipulation, and that goes a long way toward
> making the C++ interface to Lua much cleaner.
> > I didn't see mention of it on lua-users.org, or maybe it was
> > in too obscure a place to find.
> I don't think it was there, although a past C++ wrapper I wrote, LuaState,
> was. I decided I wasn't going to make the Lua mailing list or other
> Lua-core-specific sites my personal advertising spot. Normally, I take
> LuaPlus conversations offline if they ever show up on list. Since your
> question was asked to the Lua community, I am responding to the Lua
> > Martin says:
> > I was looking at LuaPlus but gave up on the facts that it was
> Win32 only...
> It may look that way, but it isn't entirely true. There is one individual
> am aware of using LuaPlus on Linux. Sure, he doesn't have access to the
> Remote Lua Debugger or the various VS.NET Lua add-ins, but that's only
> of the package. Your statement just reminded me that this individual was
> going to send me the patches to LuaPlus to get it compiling on Linux, and
> never followed up on it.
> The biggest Linux issues we ran into were #pragma once not existing in
> headers and wchar_t actually being 4 bytes instead of 2.
> > There is also "Sol" which LuaPlus (and LuaState) seem to take ideas
> > It also appears that most of Sol's "improvements" were inherited for Lua
> > version 5.
> Yep. Edgar and I used to have conversations about Lua features. I always
> gave him credit for what was his. My biggest issue with Sol was it was a
> huge rework of the Lua core. LuaPlus just patches the core when a feature
> is needed. Sol renamed EVERYTHING.
> > John says:
> > As far as C++ wrappers, I haven't had the opportunity to use it yet,
> > but have you looked at luabind (http://luabind.sourceforge.net/)?
> LuaBind and LuaPlus fill two different niches. LuaPlus isn't interested
> duplicating features like cross language inheritance. The LuaBind team
> an EXCELLENT job at implementing features like that. My biggest issue
> LuaPlus is its reliance on Boost. You can't really pick and choose a few
> features of Boost. You take it all or you take nothing. I'm not in a
> position to inherit the entire library (and its subsequent reliance on
> > John says:
> > LuaBind: Personally I wonder about the efficiency of it all
> > if used extensively...
> Interestingly enough, under VC7 without all the special overloading stuff
> LuaBind takes care of, the generated assembly code is basically as
> as if you had called all the lua_*() APIs by hand. (It is in LuaPlus,
> > I'll check out luabind, at first glance it seems better supported
> > than LuaPlus.
> Depends on what you mean by "better supported..." :)