[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: c++ classes in lua
- From: Enno Rehling <enno@...>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:22:52 +0200
Johannes Hager wrote:
Do you think luna isnt simpler?
Luna is simple, but not easy. luna is also just a proof-of-concept
implementation, not a fully supported product.
I use luabind on a project here at work, and it's a really cool library. You
need boost to develop, but your client doesn't need to have that installed.
Lots of template code mean three drawbacks (but every C++ library has those
to some degree:
1. Large debug symbols
2. Longer compile times
3. More difficult to read compiler errors.
But you get an extremely intuitive, easy-to-use and as far as I see,
efficient way to wrap your C++ classes. I don't think there's anything better.
<xterm> The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should
be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take
the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?