Re: [LuaCheia-list] lib_open in nested table

[Martin Spernau <martin@...>]

Wim Couwenberg wrote:

> > Ah, no. The caller has nothing to do with the namespace ;)
> > The place a function will be after 'opening' a lib uis fixed by the module
> > author.
> >    
>
> --[[This can be done regardless of course, just put the package table
> wherever you like.  But how can the caller find it again?  People can read a
> manual (at least theoretically ;-) but module management code, as a rule of
> thumb, can not.]]
Maybe the open_lib can also return the 'path' to the newly opened module?
And I think the way it is now, one relieson the documented namespace. I 
wasn't planning on changing that. As Thatcher commented recently, there 
should be a fixed, unique address for a module interface.

Thanks very much so far for your advice and code, I think I can now see 
a way I can solve my problem.

-Martin