Re: Ambiguous Syntax (was Re: Free format strings?)

[Eric Tetz <erictetz@...>]

--- RLake@oxfam.org.uk wrote:
> (current syntax)
>     a = f;
>     (table.move or default_move)(x, y)
> 
> (! syntax)
>     a = f
>     !(table.move or default_move)(x, y)
> 
> I argue that the latter is better because the symbolic oddity is on the same
> line that requires it; if the previous line were subsequently moved during an
> edit, it wouldn't be necessary to adjust semi-colons.

Can already do that latter, right?

a = f
;(table.move or default_move)(x, y)


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com