[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: prematurely killing threads in 5.0 beta
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:38:37 -0200
>In my application, threads are handled entirely through C code, not
>Lua. I use the C functions, lua_newthread() and lua_resume(), to
>create and resume threads, rather than the Lua methods,
>coroutine.create and coroutine.resume. Assuming that threads are
>never referenced explicitly in my Lua code, what do I need to do on
>the C side of things to ensure that all references to a thread are
>gone?
The same thing you would do to make sure all references to a table are gone,
that is, the thread (which is now a Lua value, remember!) must not be on
the stack, must not be the value of a global variable, nor a value or key
in a table or the registry, not an upvalue in any function, and so on.
--lhf