[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Extension modules in 5.0? [FW: My wish list :)]
- From: Asko Kauppi <Asko.Kauppi@...>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:28:28 +0300
Could the authors (or other knowledgable sources) tell, what exactly would
be in 5.0 regarding dynamic extensions.
I've drafted one such extension module (dll/so that knows how to link itself
with Lua) but noticed that the lua_... functions need (of course!) to be
provided to the module by function pointers or otherwise (since they live on
the engine side of the dll/so barrier). I'll want to sleep over this before
using "brute force". If there's a more clever technique already on the way,
I'd like to know.
Thanks, - asko
--
Asko Kauppi
Flextronics Design Finland
Box 23, 39201 Kyröskoski, Finland
www.flextronics.com
PGP: 8348 2AE1 CEDC C81A 2255 2439 E4C8 7308 825E 32C3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe Lhoste [SMTP:PhiLho@gmx.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:36 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re:My wish list :) [RE: How can we make lua better?]
>
> > Here's my current wish-list ( and yes - I do try to keep it small! ):
> >
> > 1) Extensions to stand-alone interpreter (without recompilation)
> >
> > Standard way of loading in extensions (C/C++ dlls/so's intended to be
> used
> > >from Lua) without recompiling the stand-alone interpreter. This does
> not
> > need changes in the language itself, just the interpreter (+ some docs).
> >
> > I'm currently working on this and will be posting some results here
> soon.
> > Thanks for all the hints I got about current loadlib's etc. a while
> back!!!
> > :)
>
> AFAIK, Lua authors plan to integrate this to Lua 5.0.
>
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.