|
> [reply-to set] but: > Reply-To: lua-l@tecgraf.puc-rio.br > X-Original-Reply-To: froese@gmx.de Uh, lua-l overrides the Reply-To field. Please don't reply to my flame to the list! Send it to me. To the lua-l maintainer: would it be possible to honour an already present Reply-To field? Ciao, ET.