[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: RE: unified methods
- From: "Joshua Jensen" <jjensen@...>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:42:22 -0700
> > > Just for completion, the Sol version ;-) (and some comments)
> > >
> > > methodTable2 = methodTable:class { -- inherit methods from
> > [...]
> > This is a great approach. Just cross your fingers that nobody ever
> > removes the function class() from the method table! :)
>
> Please note that it's :class, a method from Super!
Ah, been a while since I've delved into Sol internals (and honestly, I
don't remember any of this). I'll have to look closer.
> > methods(myTable).func2()
>
> I consider methods() a low level function that shouldn't be
> used for regular programming tasks.
If the :class support is there, then the use of methods() should be
limited.
> > myTable->methodTableFuncWithSelf() -- Implicit self
> passed through to
> > a method table function.
> > Which is the same as:
> >
> methods(myTable).methodTableFuncWithSelf(methods(myTable))
> > and
> > methods(myTable):methodTableFuncWithSelf()
>
> Uh, no ;-) methods(myTable).methodTableFuncWithSelf(myTable)
My bad...
> Using shorter names:
> a->x() would be methods(a).x(a)
>
> [But using the colon for this looks much much better! SCNR ;-)]
Than the -> symbol? Yep, it does.
Josh