Re: tinsert issue

[Roberto Ierusalimschy <rieru@...>]

On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Philippe Lhoste wrote:

> I wrote, in an answer to Volkan Civelek:
> > [...]
> > A way to get the result you expect is to rewrite the tinsert function as
> > follow:
> > [...]
> > "size", it becomes the new size. Works at least with your code, I didn't
> tested it
> > thoroughly....
>
> Neither Roberto nor Luiz reacted to my post. So I ask again: is my
> correction completely stupid, or just outside the definition of tinsert?
> Do you think tinsert function should be improved along the line of my
> suggestion, or just the documentation improved to handle Volkan's case?

Sorry about the silence. Probably we will correct tinsert along these lines.

-- Roberto