[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Performance
- From: "David Burgess" <david@...>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:35:56 +1100
I have benchmarked (for a client application) LUA and SmallC
against using C++.
Both LUA and SmallC (SmallC won by a small margin), provided
neglible overhead against using native C++.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Chris.Kaiser@peoplefirst.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <lua-l@tecgraf.puc-rio.br>
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:47 AM
Subject: RE: Performance
One good reason why, and one that I need, is to convince management
that its a worthy solution to some dynamic code generation problems.
My boss wants me to generate compiled C++ on the fly based on the
user communities mods. We're to build a series of tools to enable
the user community to change the business rules on the fly. I'd like
for these rules to be generated in lua and parsed from our C++ engine.
But I need to convince him that it will be fast enough.
Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Passaniti [mailto:jpass@rochester.rr.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 3:07 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: RE: Performance
>
>
> > Can someone point me to some performance
> > comparisons of Lua vs C++?
>
> Can we ask why? What question are you trying to answer?
>