Re: Shoehorning into 64 KB

[Tore Lund <tl001@...>]

Edgar Toernig wrote:
> 
> IMHO Lua's not really good for this kind of environment.  It's
> not that it _wastes_ memory, but it was not designed for these
> memory constraints (low overhead, compact data, fragmentation
> avoidance, ...).  I.e. Forth is a masterpiece in this area.
> [please not another "other language" thread :-)]

C and assembler are also rather good in this area, but I had really
hoped to leave these prehistoric languages behind.  Anyway, thanks for
your warning, we'll see.
-- 
    Tore