[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: non-empty false...
- From: Steve Dekorte <dekorte@...>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 13:30:20 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, David Jeske wrote:
> I'm trying to put together a non-empty false value, and I can't figure
> out a way to do it. It seems to me that in order to do this I would
> need a tag method which is used for boolean comparison (as opposed to
> assignment). That way I could do:
>
> Do any of you know an existing method for getting this kind of behavior?
You could have global true and false objects and use an "isEqual_" method
in place of "==".
true = {
isEqual_ = function (self, o)
if ( self == o ) then return 1 end
return 0
}
false = clone(true)
> I have three reasons for wanting to do this:
>
> 1) My first motivation for this is that in proto-style "parent"
> inheritence schemes, any values which are "nil" are not-present, which
> means that accessing them requires a search of the entire inheritence
> tree, just to not find the nil value.
how about using "Nil" instead of nil and making Nil = 0?
(Just use 0 instead off nil for false boolean values)
Steve