[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: globals
- From: rw20@...
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 22:32:37 -0500 (EST)
> >one other may be not a usefull thing but I think it has some grounds to go
> >with it, would be having lua compiled with a #define that any variables
> >that are accessed that are not local, and have not been predefined as
> >global complain about them but still let the code compile.
> >
> >how does that sound?
>
> Why add new statements to the language when a solution that meets our
> needs and does not require this is available?
The above proposal doesn't really fix things (it does improve things
somewhat). I think a full solution should control all global access not
just creation.
This idea doesn't add anything to the language (it adds to the C code).
What is the solution that doesn't require changing Lua? Didn't I go into
the need to optionally enforce some scheme (since anything else is to some
degree like saying, "practice good programming")? I hope these notes are
actually getting through.
Does anyone know how to make the list server send emails to the sender?
I'm not getting copies of my own emails.
Russ