Re: locals again

[Steve Dekorte <steve@...>]

>Not really - the problem was in confusing globals with locals.
>In my scheme that's not possible.
>
>You can still confuse locals with locals and globals with globals,
>but not with each other anymore.

rw20@cornell.edu wrote:
>Yes, but that's just saying "programmer do XXX  to avoid bugs" and
>not helping the programmer do it.  Following a global variable naming
>convention is just as good.

I don't see what your getting at.
Please show me how globals and locals can get confused in my scheme.

Steve