Search lua-l
This index contains 143,615 documents and
1,774,615 keywords. Last update on
2023-03-09 .
- 41. Re: Question on get/setmetatable() (score: 2)
- Author: "Joseph C. Sible" <josephcsible@...>
- Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 14:35:11 -0400
- This is a pet peeve of mine: you don't ever need to restrict setmetatable or getmetatable. You can't use setmetatable on non-tables even with no sandboxing, and that plus using __metatable appropriat
- 42. Re: Question on get/setmetatable() (score: 2)
- Author: Andrew Gierth <andrew@...>
- Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 14:05:13 +0100
- Philippe> I'm not inventing the [[...]] notation: Well, you'd need to invent something else, because [[...]] already has a meaning in Lua. (t[[x]] is actually a function call, though not a very obvi
- 43. Re: question on _ENV (score: 2)
- Author: Andrew Gierth <andrew@...>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 18:31:15 +0100
- Coda> The advantage is exactly the same thing: it uses the standard Coda> language mechanisms instead of poking at the function internals, Coda> and it ends up also being a little more flexible and
- 44. Re: question on local vs nonlocal (score: 3)
- Author: Philippe Verdy <verdyp@...>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 09:09:59 +0200
- Finally if all variables are purely local and you enforce Lua to behave as a functional language, all Lua scripts will have to pass many input and output parameters explicitly. Calling functions will
- 45. Re: question on local vs nonlocal (score: 3)
- Author: Philippe Verdy <verdyp@...>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 09:01:25 +0200
- Also the proposed "solution", if it becomes implemented by default, would create a severe security issue: if the "\" syntax is used to uinconditionally give access to the parent environment, it will
- 46. Re: question on local vs nonlocal (score: 2)
- Author: William Ahern <william@...>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 15:47:52 -0700
- The creator of Ruby called local-by-default "the single biggest design flaw in Ruby". http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/42266 All the problems you have with unintended or ac
- 47. Release: JAL 0.0.1 Alpha (score: 2)
- Author: Stefan Ginsberg <stefan.ginsberg@...>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 12:03:49 +0100
- Hello. I have released JAL 0.0.1 Alpha as a spinoff of Lua. JAL has various changes to the codebase which in my opinion improve the functionality on several points. Please do not view any of this as
- 48. Re: Interrupting a lua script (score: 2)
- Author: Archie Cobbs <archie.cobbs@...>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:01:01 -0600
- On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 2:28 PM Levente Kovacs <leventelist@gmail.com> wrote: I have a C application that runs a LUA script. That script might have an infinite loop. Is there any way in my C applicat
- 49. Re: Why no for table-iterator like e. g. "hashpairs"? (score: 2)
- Author: Coda Highland <chighland@...>
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 21:12:43 -0600
- Er, seriously? Compiled _javascript_ is faster than C? How is the current version of Lua not ?safe?? It?s one of the most stable code bases I?ve ever encountered. The performance claim might actuall
- 50. Re: Lua and Sol2 on Embedded Target? (score: 2)
- Author: Philipp Janda <siffiejoe@...>
- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 16:53:54 +0200
- Am 25.10.19 um 04:41 schröbte Russell Haley: Hello, Hi! So, now comes the torrent of questions: - Has anyone used Lua with Keil? I haven't, but it seems llvm/clang based with complete c++14 support,
- 51. Re: On implementing a functions whitelist for a sandbox (score: 4)
- Author: Sean Conner <sean@...>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 12:01:52 -0400
- It was thus said that the Great Dennis Fischer once stated: Ah, now that I see what code was presented in _Programming in Lua_ for sandboxing, I can see where the confusion comes froms. The approach
- 52. Re: On implementing a functions whitelist for a sandbox (score: 4)
- Author: Sean Conner <sean@...>
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 23:42:17 -0400
- It was thus said that the Great Kynn Jones once stated: You're welcome. A sandbox is just a limited environment in which you run a program. For Lua, this can be anything from an environment devoid of
- 53. Re: On implementing a functions whitelist for a sandbox (score: 2)
- Author: Kynn Jones <kynnjo@...>
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:20:50 -0400
- Hi Sean, Thank you for the detailed explanation. I think that the disconnect here is that I am trying (**really, really, really hard**) to implement what Roberto Ierusalimschy recommends in chapter 2
- 54. Re: Suggestion: names-isolation-statement (score: 2)
- Author: nobody <nobody+lua-list@...>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:55:28 +0200
- On 11/07/2019 23.15, Egor Skriptunoff wrote: A new syntax: with white-list-of-names do .... end This statement makes all names from the outer scope (with exception of white-listed names)
- 55. Re: tostring userdata (score: 2)
- Author: Coda Highland <chighland@...>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 00:02:21 -0500
- On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 10:56 PM Sean Conner <sean@conman.org> wrote: It was thus said that the Great Coda Highland once stated: Okay, so was this *ever* brought up about tostring()? Because: [spc]
- 56. Re: [BUG] unsafe metatable paradigm (score: 2)
- Author: Viacheslav Usov <via.usov@...>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:37:11 +0200
- On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:18 PM Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote: > I suspect most sandboxes don't expose the IO library at all (mine certainly does not), since unmediated file acce
- 57. Re: [BUG] unsafe metatable paradigm (score: 2)
- Author: Andrew Gierth <andrew@...>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 22:17:47 +0100
- Viacheslav> So, why is the standard IO library not sandbox-friendly (in Viacheslav> the strict sense clarified above) out of the box? I suspect most sandboxes don't expose the IO library at all (min
- 58. Re: [BUG] unsafe metatable paradigm (score: 2)
- Author: Viacheslav Usov <via.usov@...>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:37:56 +0200
- On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 9:13 PM Egor Skriptunoff <egor.skriptunoff@gmail.com> wrote: > What trouble you are talking about? The trouble is the pervasive use of the unsafe paradigm in extant library co
- 59. Re: Errors in finalizers (score: 2)
- Author: Andrew Gierth <andrew@...>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 22:08:05 +0100
- David> But this is exactly what could happen when you throw the error David> in a finalizer: The code might currently be in a pcall which David> doesn't expect your finalizer error and therefor also
- 60. Re: lua-l Digest, Vol 105, Issue 13 (score: 2)
- Author: Sergey Kovalev <kovserg33@...>
- Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 18:52:48 +0300
- I don't really understand how to use this mail list correctly from gmail. But I just want something like this not as crutch but as usual case for regular use. function pure_function(fn) return lo
Search by
Namazu v2.0.21