Search lua-l
This index contains 143,615 documents and
1,774,615 keywords. Last update on
2023-03-09 .
- 141. Re: Why doesn't the lua list get replaced with a forum ? (score: 33)
- Author: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:58:54 -0300
- BTW, gmane.comp.lang.lua.general should now contain the complete lua-l archives. (Thanks to Philippe Lhoste for pointing it out to us.) --lhf
- 142. Re: Why doesn't the lua list get replaced with a forum ? (score: 33)
- Author: Javier Guerra <javier@...>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:32:47 -0500
- wholeheartedly agree -- Javier Attachment: pgpDJsCmXPob0.pgp Description: PGP signature
- 143. Re: Why doesn't the lua list get replaced with a forum ? (score: 33)
- Author: "D Burgess" <dburgess@...>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:33:12 +1000
- In case I was unclear, I was expressing my agreement with David Given. I hate forums. The list has been demonstrably successful. DB
- 144. Re: Why doesn't the lua list get replaced with a forum ? (score: 33)
- Author: George Petsagourakis <petsagouris@...>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:02:37 +0000 (UTC)
- Just as an addition to my reply I'd like to point the PtokaX Lua Board (http://luaboard.sytes.net/) The P.L.B. at the moment has 61,110 Posts in 5,934 Topics by 3,414 Members. ~70% of the posting tha
- 145. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: John Belmonte <john@...>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:43:47 -0400
- If I'm on limited bandwidth, I want to just get messages which are important. IMAP is quite effective here. Message headers are downloaded efficiently, and a message body is copied to my local machin
- 146. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: "Jason P" <ahq_ranger@...>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 11:40:14 -0400
- I'd be more than happy to host LUA forums on my phpbb2 board, which is stable and I've had forever... Jason http://greyearth.com _________________________________________________________________ MSN
- 147. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: Rob Kendrick <lua-l@...>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 16:30:11 +0100
- $10 a month's quite a lot. Trying, but failing, to avoid sounding like an advert, I know of a web host that's very Lua friendly (all their infrastructure's written in Lua) and is significantly cheape
- 148. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: John Belmonte <john@...>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 12:09:17 -0400
- Michael Cumming wrote: Well, we could debate the relative merits of one means of communicating versus another to no end. The fact is that mail lists are in decline and the reasons are obvious. The re
- 149. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: Markus Fritsche <Fritsche.Markus@...>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 17:46:03 +0200
- Well, we could debate the relative merits of one means of communicating versus another to no end. The fact is that mail lists are in decline and the reasons are obvious. Slowly, I'm convinced that t
- 150. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: Adrian Perez <elflord@...>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 13:34:51 +0200
- Just my (simple) opinion: I prefer mailing lists, too. Reasons are nearly the same that were posted by other people, I won't repeat them again, and again, and again, and... -- Adrian Perez moebius _a
- 151. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: Enrico Colombini <erix@...>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 12:42:59 +0200
- Just for the record, I strongly prefer the mailing list. Enrico
- 152. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: Garth Dighton <gdighton@...>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
- ==
- 153. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: Philippe Lhoste <PhiLho@...>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 15:24:53 +0200
- or... subscribe to the mailing list? Yes, that is a solution. :-) If really one want to keep a monolithic file of the archives, he just have to choose an e-mail client storing folders in Mime format
- 154. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: Maxime Petazzoni <maxime.petazzoni@...>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:03:56 +0200
- Why not just remove the e-mail addresses from the archives? We could make it harder for people to find out the addresses, like requiring some kind of procedure a haverster won't be able to do. Just c
- 155. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: Danilo Tuler <tuler@...>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:54:41 +0000 (UTC)
- Hi, Just to remember, there is a gmane gateway available at http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.lua.general I'm sending this message using its web interface. Does this work fine? Danilo
- 156. Re: We need a forum! (score: 33)
- Author: Martin Spernau <martin@...>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 23:08:18 +0200
- I'm not sure... but I think the search system for the lua-l (http://lua-users.org/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi) is rather powerfull. Maybe it's search syntax is slightly 'uncommon' for us all using Google dayl
- 157. Re: lua sandbox from c/c++ (score: 18)
- Author: forum <forumme5487@...>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:20:31 +0530
- Obviously the io library was just an example. I used many more. But none the less, the way as I described didn't stop me from using them at all. Whats meant by safe is simply not being able to do cer
- 158. Re: lua sandbox from c/c++ (score: 18)
- Author: forum <forumme5487@...>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:37:42 +0530
- That doesn't look like its working. On 4/19/2012 8:28 PM, Vinicius Jarina wrote: You can wrap your call with a lua code like: caller.p <-- sandbox setup lua_pushstring <-- script_to_run.p luaL_loadfi
- 159. Re: lua sandbox from c/c++ (score: 17)
- Author: forum <forumme5487@...>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:34:35 +0530
- Yes I have read it. The point being just run an env without them. But that only applies to doing it from lua, not doing it from c/c++. Within the application itself. For your specific question, inste
- 160. lua sandbox from c/c++ (score: 17)
- Author: forum <forumme5487@...>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:47:56 +0530
- How can I run a safe sandbox from within a c/c++ application? I tried: "lua_pushnil(L); lua_setglobal(L, "io");" etc etc ... But I was still able to use them after I ran a script with "dostring" or "
Search by
Namazu v2.0.21