Re: Lua version census - the results!

[Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@...>]

On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 16:43, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
<lhf@tecgraf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> Could you please comment on what the results mean. Any surprises? Any
> points on which to focus attention?


the thing that surprised me is the popularity of Lua 5.1   The usual
answer is because of LuaJIT stagnation, but Lua5.1 bars are
significantly higher than LuaJIT's so i'm not sure it's the main
reason.

maybe it's commonly considered a "good enough" version and so there's
little pressure to update?  or is there any big application that uses
it and tips the scale?

what doesn't surprise is the low score of Lua5.2  I think 5.3 is much
more attractive.


-- 
Javier