[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: future of annotations in Lua?
- From: Jim <sysinit@...>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 06:22:42 +0200
08.06.2019, 23:29, "szbnwer@gmail.com" <szbnwer@gmail.com>:
>> @attributename -- for attributes without arguments
>> @(attributename arguments) -- for attributes with arguments
>
> +1, but a big ONE!
> currently this is the most friendly for my eyes
indeed, this syntax looks better.
but what about - say -
@@attributename arg1 arg2 ...@
(assuming the arguments do not contain "@" themselves),
i. e. an "@" immediately following the preceding "@" indicates
an attribute with arguments ?
or even
@$attributename arg1 arg2 ...$
?
