Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables)

["Thomas Jericke" <tjericke@...>]

-----Original Message----- 
> From: "Sean Conner" <sean@conman.org> 
> To: "Lua mailing list" <lua-l@lists.lua.org> 
> Date: 09-07-2016 11:17 
> Subject: Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables) 
> 
> It was thus said that the Great Thomas Jericke once stated:
> > > From: "Soni L." <fakedme@gmail.com> 
> > > On 08/07/16 06:51 AM, Thomas Jericke wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The current implementation of # could easily just be moved to a 
> > > > function of the table library.
> > > 
> > > #"a string"
> > > 
> > > vs
> > > 
> > > table.len("a string")
> > > 
> > I really don't know what you try to say to me :-/
> 
>   I think Soni is concerned that you were trying to remove the '#' operator
> entirely.  
> 
>   -spc
> 

If that is the case, no, I am not trying to do that.

--
Thomas