Re: 'in' keyword today (was Re: mathlib)

[Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>]

2014-04-10 6:50 GMT+02:00 Coroutines <coroutines@gmail.com>:

> After thinking about this for a while I think it would be okay if
> object literals were also allowed instead of only valid identfiers:
>
> 1, 2, 3 in { 'a', 'b', 'c' } --> return 'a', b', 'c'

I'm happier with the notion that `x,y,z in tbl` is just a synonym for
`tbl.x, tbl.y, tbl.z`. The above would be better described by
{ 'a', 'b', 'c' }[1,2,3] — but let's not hijack this thread.