Re: Bytecode: Safe or not? / luac manual

[Peter Cawley <lua@...>]

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Sean Conner <sean@conman.org> wrote:
> Even if you carefully verify all the opcodes, you are still
> vulnerable to a "return-to-libc" style attack.

And what exactly is the Lua equivalent to return-to-libc?