[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: A suggestion for Lua 5.3 manual Section 8 (was "A rant about backward-incompatible changes")
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:10:37 -0300
> > Then I'm even more confused. Why did my tests pass just fine under Lua 5.2
> > without warning? Was the deprecation only in Lua 5.2's documentation? I'm pretty
> > sure that I was running these tests using vanilla Lua 5.1 and 5.2 builds, and
> > everything remained fine.
Run with compatibility on, but test with compatibility off. (Vanilla Lua
has compatibility on...)
-- Roberto
- References:
- A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Rob Kendrick
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Simon Cozens
- Re: A rant about backward-incompatible changes, Coda Highland
- A suggestion for Lua 5.3 manual Section 8 (was "A rant about backward-incompatible changes"), Peter Aronoff
- Re: A suggestion for Lua 5.3 manual Section 8 (was "A rant about backward-incompatible changes"), Coda Highland
- Re: A suggestion for Lua 5.3 manual Section 8 (was "A rant about backward-incompatible changes"), Peter Aronoff
- Re: A suggestion for Lua 5.3 manual Section 8 (was "A rant about backward-incompatible changes"), Coda Highland
