Re: The impact of a module's license on the requiring Lua

[Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>]

> While you're at it: Lua uses a variant of the MIT license, not the
> MIT/X11 license. There's a difference. I've made that mistake
> before. A discussion is somewhere in the mailing list archives.
> 
> I've decided to refer to it as the MIT license and link to:
>   http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php

Since Lua 5.0 (2003) we have adopted the MIT license, not a variant. If
there is any difference, we should correct it. I just compared the text
in that link with the Lua license, and did not see any difference. Could
you point out what it is?

-- Roberto