Re: Some enhancements in table initializations

[Geoff Leyland <geoff_leyland@...>]

On 21/09/2010, at 6:37 PM, Jonathan Castello wrote:

> While not exactly about table initializations, one thing I've
> occasionally wanted was to be able to implicitly index the current
> environment. In a table you can do {[a + b] = c}, but it would be nice
> to be able to do [a + b] = c as a normal statement. Likewise with
> accessing: x = [y].


Wouldn't that cause ambiguous syntax problems?   Would "a = b [c]:d()" be one or two statements?

Cheers,
Geoff