Re: lua_signal

[Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@...>]

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 05:45, Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13/04/10 03:05, Sam Roberts wrote:

>> And why do you go through the effort of counting signals? Signal
>> delivery is not reliable, the pending
>> signals are a bitmask, there is no counting for non-realtime signals.

> We encountered an issue with it in Prosody whereby multiple signals in quick
> succession (that is, multiple signals before the Lua callback is actually
> called) would mess up the lua-signal state and cause looping.
> Counting/queuing the signals seems an appropriate solution to me, but do
> correct me if I'm wrong.

That's the original reason why I came looking for the updated version
of lua-signal.

Alexander.