[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: unicode char ranges
- From: Rob Kendrick <rjek@...>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 22:50:16 +0000
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 12:37:10AM +0200, Dirk Laurie wrote:
> 2012/12/4 Marc Balmer <marc@msys.ch>:
>
> > this is bogus and wrong on so many levels.
>
> > there are 109'242 digital glyphs (codepoints) defined and
> > what you offer here is just a poor and limited subset.
> > totally useless.
>
> Bogus, wrong, poor, limited, useless.
And he's not wrong.
B.
