[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Distros upgrading to Lua 5.2 was: (no subject)
- From: Enrico Tassi <gareuselesinge@...>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:28:34 +0100
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:04:23AM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote:
> (sorry for forgetting the proper subject)
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Pierre Chapuis <catwell@archlinux.us> wrote:
> > On 10.11.2011 14:49, Elias Barrionovo wrote:
> >
> > In my opinion scripts distributed in packages should always use
> > a specific version of the interpreter. The level of specificity is the
> > one at which APIs break, so for Lua 'lua51' or 'lua5.1' should be OK.
>
> Is there some official recommendation if "lua51" or "lua5.1" is preferred?
Not that I know. In Debian we use lua5.1, dot is a valid character so no
mangling is really required here.
Ciao
--
Enrico Tassi
