Re: Ternary operator patch

[David Kastrup <dak@...>]

Fabien <fleutot+lua@gmail.com> writes:

> Lua's grammar is designed in such a way that the end of an expression
> can almost always(*) be determined without an explicit termination
> keyword.
>
> (*) the only exception I can think of, and which doesn't feel right
> IMO, is the fact that "foo(bar)(gnu)(gnat)" is understood differently
> from "foo(bar)\n(gnu)(gnat)".

Huh?  What makes you think that?  Aren't you confusing "\n" with ";"?

-- 
David Kastrup