Re: Simple XHTML (XML) parser/printer

[Miles Bader <miles@...>]

Tuomo Valkonen <tuomov@iki.fi> writes:
> Likewise, nothing stops a standard structural text-based format from 
> using a nicer syntax. in this department, YAML has actually gained 
> some support, although I find it a bit too strict and complex for 
> arbitrary user-editable configuration files: it still remains more 
> of a protocol/savefile format -- and, of course, totally unsuitable
> for documents.

Yeah,... in this respect, yaml seems even worse than xml, since it has
the significant-whitespace mess going on (worst idea ever...).

-Miles

-- 
Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious.