[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua is not skin deep
- From: Rob Kendrick <lua-l@...>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:23:48 +0000
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 15:18 +0200, Ketmar Dark wrote:
> > After mucking around with a token filter for a few hours, I got this
> > to compile correctly. It 'looks' like a bastardized JavaScript, but it
> > actually is Lua. The semantics are the same, and the transformation
> > was fairly simple (110 lines of Lua).
> it's NOT Lua. it's bastardized Python vomiting JS.
The only real Pythonism here is "def" - everything else is simply
allowing { to be then/do and } be end.
It's certainly Lua in all but appearance, which is what the OP is
getting at. And beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
B.
